ports/132041: Broken Intel video driver
Paul B. Mahol
onemda at gmail.com
Wed Apr 29 12:40:16 UTC 2009
On 4/28/09, Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at freebsd.org> wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/132041; it has been noted by GNATS.
>
> From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida at freebsd.org>
> To: Arthur Barlow <arthurbarlow at earthlink.net>
> Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ports/132041: Broken Intel video driver
> Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:26:17 +0300
>
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:05:51 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas
> <keramida at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg/2009-April/045117.html
> >
> > I've just updated my local port to 2.7.0 a few minutes ago and attached
> > the patch of the update to this message. The 2.7.0 release of the Intel
> > video driver seems a lot more stable so far. At least, I haven't been
> > able to crash it by switching desktops while a video is playing or by
> > clicking to the context menu of a media player, or by covering a media
> > player with another window.
>
> I spoke too soon. I managed to crash xf86-video-intel-2.7.0 too, through
> mplayer again (by minimizing and restoring the mplayer window a few
> times inside GNOME). The backtrace this was was:
>
> root at kobe:/root# gdb /usr/local/bin/Xorg /var/gdm/Xorg.core
> [...]
> #0 0x2860a5e7 in kill () at kill.S:2
> 2 RSYSCALL(kill)
> [New Thread 28701140 (LWP 100170)]
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x2860a5e7 in kill () at kill.S:2
> #1 0x2851b3f7 in _raise (sig=6) at
> /usr/src/lib/libthr/thread/thr_sig.c:185
> #2 0x2860916a in abort () at /usr/src/lib/libc/stdlib/abort.c:65
> #3 0x285ef696 in __assert (func=0xbfbfe7a4 "\006", file=0x3 <Address 0x3
> out of bounds>, line=0,
> failedexpr=0x286d0664 "bo_fake->block->bo == &bo_fake->bo") at
> /usr/src/lib/libc/gen/assert.c:54
> #4 0x286cd5d3 in drm_intel_fake_reloc_and_validate_buffer () from
> /usr/local/lib/libdrm_intel.so.1
> #5 0x286cd52b in drm_intel_fake_reloc_and_validate_buffer () from
> /usr/local/lib/libdrm_intel.so.1
> #6 0x286cd52b in drm_intel_fake_reloc_and_validate_buffer () from
> /usr/local/lib/libdrm_intel.so.1
> #7 0x286cd90d in drm_intel_fake_bo_exec () from
> /usr/local/lib/libdrm_intel.so.1
> #8 0x286cb53e in drm_intel_bo_exec () from
> /usr/local/lib/libdrm_intel.so.1
> #9 0x2881843a in intel_batch_flush () from
> /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//intel_drv.so
> #10 0x28823c9f in I830BlockHandler () from
> /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//intel_drv.so
> #11 0x08167890 in AnimCurScreenBlockHandler ()
> #12 0x08133318 in compBlockHandler ()
> #13 0x08089808 in BlockHandler ()
> #14 0x0812177e in WaitForSomething ()
> #15 0x081daba0 in AnyClientsWriteBlocked ()
> #16 0x081dbd2c in ?? ()
> #17 0x081d0438 in __JCR_LIST__ ()
> #18 0x2873d5b0 in ?? ()
> #19 0x0000000c in ?? ()
> #20 0xbfbfeab8 in ?? ()
> #21 0x08127b59 in Xalloc ()
> #22 0x081d0438 in __JCR_LIST__ ()
> #23 0x3c910800 in ?? ()
> #24 0x3c9a7cc0 in ?? ()
> #25 0xbfbfed48 in ?? ()
?? are mistery here, perhaps order of port upgrading dri libdrm and
Mesa ports is
important when buiding new X11 stuff server?
> #26 0x08085d1d in Dispatch ()
> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
> (gdb) q
>
> This was with libdrm-2.4.9 from the Ports tree.
>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-x11 at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
--
Paul
More information about the freebsd-x11
mailing list