Please Test: Updated Ral Driver Patch for rt2860/rt3090

[matt]

On 03/11/12 09:56, Sevan / Venture37 wrote:
> On 11/03/2012 04:07, matt wrote:
>> What several errors? Compiles fine against head...are you compiling
>> against 9? clang?
>> Or is the patch dumping the modules and dev folder out early?
>> Confused...it worked fine here...I admit my patch-fu is weak :).
>
> Cosmetic:
> Some files use CR/LF
> duplicate code in header files (updated a couple of hours ago)
>
> Show stoppers:
> in if_ral_pci.c the RT2860 includes, PCI_* constants & ral_rt2860_opns 
> data structure declarations were truncated onto single lines
> in rt2860.c contained duplicate code which caused redeclaration errors 
> during compilation
>
>> Looks good on attach though...I only have a 1t1r so it's nice to see
>> something else attach.
>
> I now understand why you mentioned APs running on channels above 9 :)
>
>
> On 11/03/2012 04:15, matt wrote:
> > Re access points...try "ifconfig wlan0 create wlandev ral0"
> > ifconfig ral0 up (just in case...)
> > ifconfig wlan0 up
> > sleep 1
> > ifconfig wlan0 scan
> >
> > I have seen it take a second for results to be available, i.e. "up 
> scan" returns no list.
>
> Didn't make any difference
> 3 access points, one in 802.11N & G mode with WPA2 personal running on 
> channel 3, mifi running on channel 1 with WPA2 personal (running in 
> B/G mode if I remember right & my macbook pro running on channel 5 
> with no encryption, unable to find anything.
>
> > Re: errors:
> > Did you by chance build the module along with kernel or separately?
>
> module is currently installed via a separate build but the errors 
> happened during buildkernel.
>
>
> Sevan / Venture37
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-wireless at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to 
> "freebsd-wireless-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
I'm going to fix the patch and repost. I'm definitely getting issues 
with ^M with the gzipped version of the patch, which is causing line 
truncation.

I'll post a new one in a bit. If you want to help, would you be ok with 
git as opposed to hg?

Thanks!

Matt