Fwd: sata to usb not working

[john smith]

sorry I did not send directly  to the list

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: john smith <hoselang at gmail.com>
Date: Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: sata to usb not working
To: Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at c2i.net>


 I've done the upgrade, but still get the same errors. How exactly should I
tweak the timings? Any hints?
Tks





On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 9:22 AM, john smith <hoselang at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> I'm doing the upgrade to -stable (still in "buildworld"), in the meantime
> I've found out that the powered one (the one without enclosure) works if in
> turn connected to a powered hub (both must have external power to work).
> Here is the relevant usbconfig output:
>
> ugen7.2: <USB2.0 Hub vendor 0x05e3> at usbus7, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
> (480Mbps) pwr=SAVE
> ugen7.3: <product 0x5106 vendor 0x174c> at usbus7, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH
> (480Mbps) pwr=ON
>
> here the /var/log/messages:
>
> kernel: ugen7.3: <vendor 0x174c> at usbus7
> kernel: umass0: <vendor 0x174c product 0x5106, class 0/0, rev 2.10/0.01,
> addr 3> on usbus7
> kernel: umass0:  SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000
> kernel: umass0:5:0:-1: Attached to scbus5
> kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): REPORT LUNS. CDB: a0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10
> 0 0
> kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error
> kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition
> kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:20,0
> (Invalid command operation code)
> kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Error 22, Unretryable error
> kernel: da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus5 target 0 lun 0
> kernel: da0: <ST925082 7AS 3.CM> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-5 device
> kernel: da0: 40.000MB/s transfers
> kernel: da0: 238475MB (488397168 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 30401C)
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 4:23 PM, john smith <hoselang at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ok, thanks, will let you know.
>>
>> On 2/1/13, Hans Petter Selasky <hselasky at c2i.net> wrote:
>> > On Friday 01 February 2013 08:59:07 john smith wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >> thanks for you reply.
>> >> Is upgrading to -stable conditio sine qua non?
>> >> If so I'll give it a try.
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > If you are on 9-release and upgrade to 9-stable, should not break
>> anything.
>> >
>> > If you have USB modules in /boot/modules, those might have to be
>> > re-compiled.
>> >
>> > --HPS
>> >
>>
>
>