wireless keyboard with built in mouse

[Sam Lawrance]

On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:55:09 -0400
"Brian K. White" <brian at aljex.com> wrote:

> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Sam Lawrance" <boris at brooknet.com.au>
> To: "Brian K. White" <brian at aljex.com>
> Cc: <freebsd-current at freebsd.org>; <freebsd-usb at freebsd.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2005 10:22 AM
> Subject: Re: wireless keyboard with built in mouse
> 
> 
> > On Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:09:04 -0400
> > "Brian K. White" <brian at aljex.com> wrote:
> >
> >> A while back I posted description of the mouse part of a wireless
> >> usb keyboard not working on 5.4
> >>  this questio and got asked what happens when I cat /dev/uhid0
> >> while moving the mouse, pressing the buttons etc..
> >> http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200507311722.52659.mistry.7
> >>
> >> Then later someone else added the comment that the problem is that
> >> there is more than one device on one usb receiver and that 6.0 has
> >> the necessary usb updates to handle that:
> >> I can't find a link to that comment. Maybe they sent it directly
> >> rather than to either -current or -usb and I've deleted my copy
> >> since then.
> >
> > See these PRs:
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77604
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=85972
> >
> > The patches provided solved a similar problem for me.  I believe the
> > second PR there is the same problem, just waiting for submitter to
> > confirm.
> 
> Thanks much. It's building now.
> 
> Are these patches available in an un-munged form somewhere?
> Even the "raw pr" option on the web page still only produces a page
> where the original emails and attachments have been munged with "=D2"
> etc... When I pasted the hid.c patch into a file, patch just
> complains about malformed patch.
> I figured out that the web interface or the cutting & pasting
> stripped off the single leading space that unchanged lines are
> supposed to have, manually put them back in the patch. Manually
> stripped the trailing space that was added to every line, made sure
> the whitespace was the same (tabs vs spaces) patch doesn't complain
> anymore, now it just rejects the hunk for no reason I can figure out.
> I tried using patch -l and -F n , I ended up applying the changes
> completely by hand. I'm glad it was a small patch!
> 
> ...time passes...
> 
> Ok, it built cleanly but didn't change anything I can see.

Having read your dmesg, I now understand the problem you describe. I
think those PRs might be unrelated.  Sorry :-(