[erey at ernw.de: [ipv6hackers] RFC 6980 Testing]

[Xin Li]

(+transport@).

On 6/24/17 20:55, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> It looks like there's a regression (10.3 -> 11.0) wrt to IPv6
> fragmentation and ND.
> 
> Any persons working on IPv6 that I can contact about it ?
> 
> ----- Forwarded message from Enno Rey <erey at ernw.de> -----
> 
> Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2017 09:34:52 +0200
> From: Enno Rey <erey at ernw.de>
> To: ipv6hackers at lists.si6networks.com
> Subject: [ipv6hackers] RFC 6980 Testing
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
> 
> All,
> 
> might be of interest for some of you: we just released test results as for the RFC 6980 stance of FreeBSD (10.3 an 11.0). see
> https://insinuator.net/2017/06/testing-rfc-6980-implementations-of-freebsd/
> 
> This was a sequel from similar testing of Windows Server 2016/Windows 10:
> https://insinuator.net/2017/03/testing-rfc-6980-implementations-with-chiron/
> 
> We plan to perform this for various Linux kernels soon, too.
> 
> Everybody have a great weekend
> 
> Enno
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-transport/attachments/20170624/6a841a16/attachment.sig>