December 2015 Archives by date

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...

Starting: Tue Dec 1 13:30:34 UTC 2015
Ending: Mon Dec 28 23:06:09 UTC 2015
Messages: 66

• [Re-post from users]: gmake question   William A. Mahaffey III
• [Re-post from users]: gmake question   William A. Mahaffey III
• gcc5 question   William A. Mahaffey III
• gcc5 question   Dimitry Andric
• gcc5 question   William A. Mahaffey III
• gcc5 question   Gerald Pfeifer
• gcc5 question   William A. Mahaffey III
• Can we have a toolchain that works?   Craig Rodrigues
• Can we have a toolchain that works?   John Baldwin
• svn commit: r291739 - head/share/mk vs. /usr/src/lib/libc/tests/ssp for powerpc64/gcc builds   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Mark Millard
• mixed language link problems   William A. Mahaffey III
• mixed language link problems   William A. Mahaffey III
• 11.0-CURRENT (on powerpc64) WITH_CCACHE_BUILD= : example failure   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (on powerpc64) WITH_CCACHE_BUILD= : example failure   Mark Millard
• powerpc64-gcc 5.2 vintages get L". . ." type wrong compared to Char for FreeBSD for lib32 compiling   Mark Millard
• powerpc64-gcc 5.2 vintages get L". . ." type wrong compared to Char for FreeBSD for lib32 compiling   Andreas Tobler
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Simon J. Gerraty
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Simon J. Gerraty
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Bryan Drewery
• powerpc64-gcc 5.2 vintages get L". . ." type wrong compared to Char for FreeBSD for lib32 compiling   Mark Millard
• More static link questions   William A. Mahaffey III
• ongoing link issues   William A. Mahaffey III
• ongoing link issues   Dimitry Andric
• ongoing link issues   William A. Mahaffey III
• ongoing link issues   William A. Mahaffey III
• gcc5-devel question   William A. Mahaffey III
• gcc5-devel question   William A. Mahaffey III
• bug 205183: powerpc64's 11.0-CURRENT clang 3.7 crashes compiling atf-check.cpp during buildworld   Mark Millard
• bug 205183: powerpc64's 11.0-CURRENT clang 3.7 crashes compiling atf-check.cpp during buildworld   Roman Divacky
• gcc5-devel questions   William A. Mahaffey III
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT lib32/libc.so.7 _init dies (powerpc64-gcc/WITH_LIBCPLUSPLUS based): details of how   Mark Millard
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT's clang binds -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Mark Millard
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT's clang binds -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Roman Divacky
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT's clang binds -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Konstantin Belousov
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT's clang binds -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Bryan Drewery
• powerpc64: powerpc64-gcc, gcc49, gcc5 bind -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 instead of /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT SRC_ENV_CONF file vs. MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX in the file: they do not mix   Bryan Drewery
• powerpc64 11.0-CURRENT's clang binds -m32 -mcpu=powerpc a.out to /libexec/ld-elf.so.1   Andreas Tobler
• [Bug 205453] 11.0-CURRENT libcxxrt/guard.cc uses C11's _Static_assert in conditionally-compiled C++ code and when it is used buildworld fails for syntax errors in g++ compilers   bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
• [Bug 205453] 11.0-CURRENT libcxxrt/guard.cc uses C11's _Static_assert in conditionally-compiled C++ code and when it is used buildworld fails for syntax errors in g++ compilers   bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
• [Bug 205453] 11.0-CURRENT libcxxrt/guard.cc uses C11's _Static_assert in conditionally-compiled C++ code and when it is used buildworld fails for syntax errors in g++ compilers   bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
• [Bug 205453] 11.0-CURRENT libcxxrt/guard.cc uses C11's _Static_assert in conditionally-compiled C++ code and when it is used buildworld fails for syntax errors in g++ compilers   bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
• [toolchain] gcc5-devel question   Gerald Pfeifer
• [toolchain] gcc5-devel question   William A. Mahaffey III
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Warner Losh
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Warner Losh
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Warner Losh
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Ian Lepore
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Mark Millard
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Andrew Turner
• 11.0-CURRENT (r292413) on a rpi2b: arm-gnueabi-freebsd/bin/ar, _fseeko, and memset vs memory alignment (SCTRL bit[1]=1?): Explains the Bus error?   Konstantin Belousov
• llvm.org's James Molloy on the need for -mno-unaligned-access for SCTLR bit[1]==1 arm contexts   Mark Millard

Last message date: Mon Dec 28 23:06:09 UTC 2015
Archived on: Mon Dec 28 23:06:12 UTC 2015

• Messages sorted by: [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
• More info on this list...