Profiling with clang
Roman Divacky
rdivacky at freebsd.org
Sun Sep 15 09:54:17 UTC 2013
clang -pg should work just fine... what problems are you seeing?
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 11:26:33AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> Recently I've been using profiling with c++ -pg a lot. I'm developing
> a simulation and have been able to more than double the performance,
> just by focusing my attention on the top functions listed in the
> profile. Inlining them, optimising them or finding ways to call them
> less often.
>
> Even though I use clang as my compiler, for profiling I have to refer
> to the old gcc42. Is there any work on making profiling work with
> clang?
>
>
> On a side node, clang and gcc47 from ports produce equally fast
> binaries (there is literally no difference outside of the error margin).
>
> For both clang and gcc47 -O3 binaries are not faster than -O2 binaries.
> They used to be slower, when the code was less polished.
>
> --
> A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
> A: Top-posting.
> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-toolchain at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-toolchain
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-toolchain-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
More information about the freebsd-toolchain
mailing list