[CFT] devel/binutils 2.23
Niclas Zeising
zeising at freebsd.org
Thu Nov 15 08:24:02 UTC 2012
On 2012-11-15 09:19, Hans Ottevanger wrote:
> On 11/14/12 21:19, Niclas Zeising wrote:
>> On 11/14/12 15:45, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>>> It installed fine on ia64 and sparc64, both -current.
>>> I don't know how to test. Please advise if there are
>>> simple tests.
>>>
>>> Also, just to check, I manually deleted *orig files
>>> from under files/ after applying the patch:
>>>
>>> # ls -al /usr/ports/devel/binutils/files/
>>> total 20
>>> drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 1024 Nov 14 12:58 .
>>> drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Nov 14 13:00 ..
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 353 Nov 14 12:55 patch-bfd_Makefile.in
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 297 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_Makefile.in
>>> -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 471 Nov 14 12:55 patch-gold_script.cc
>>> #
>>>
>>> because I think all files in this directory
>>> will be used as patches, no matter the name.
>>> Am I wrong?
>>>
>>> Anton
>>
>> Just compile test some binaries and see that they link and work ok.
>> The .orig files are left over when running patch, and has to be removed.
>> Sorry if I wasn't clear on that in my previous mail.
>> Thanks for testing!
>> Regards!
>
> Please be aware that apparently something went wrong with the release of
> binutils-2.23 (see the discussion ending in:
>
> http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2012-10/msg00339.html
>
> though I doubt the glitches will affect your usage) and it has been
> re-released as binutils-2.23.1. Maybe it is better to base the update if
> the binutils port on that release.
>
I noticed that late last night, but haven't had time to update the patch
yet. Thank you for pointing it out.
Regards!
--
Niclas
More information about the freebsd-toolchain
mailing list