[head tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

[Eygene Ryabinkin]

Christoph, good day.

Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:12:28AM +0200, Christoph Mallon wrote:
> Eygene Ryabinkin schrieb:
> > This is very weird (judging by the GCC's manual) since the simplest C
> > program,
> > -----
> > int main(void)
> > {
> > 	return 0;
> > }
> > 
> > void foo(void) __attribute__ ((unused))
> > {
> > 	return;
> > }
> > -----
> > but ICC 10.x produces the same error and happily chewes __attribute__
> > on the function prototype.  Anyway, I see no warnings even without
> > '((unused)) attribute with -Wall, so '__attribute__ ((unused))' looks
> > like no-op nowadays.
> 
> There is no warning about foo() being unused, because it is not static.

Yes, you're perfectly right.  Thanks for education!
-- 
Eygene
 _                ___       _.--.   #
 \`.|\..----...-'`   `-._.-'_.-'`   #  Remember that it is hard
 /  ' `         ,       __.--'      #  to read the on-line manual
 )/' _/     \   `-_,   /            #  while single-stepping the kernel.
 `-'" `"\_  ,_.-;_.-\_ ',  fsc/as   #
     _.-'_./   {_.'   ; /           #    -- FreeBSD Developers handbook
    {_.-``-'         {_/            #