[current tinderbox] failure on ia64/ia64

[Marcel Moolenaar]

On Sun, Aug 29, 2004 at 04:59:19PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> +> > 
> +> I believe it's -O2 (which is not in default CFLAGS).
> 
> Nope, it was tested with -O2. I made such breakage before, I think, and
> it was only exposed on non-i386 archs, AFAIR. Why? Where is the difference?

In the compiler. Different code transformations at different times
and to different extend can create different warnings. The uninitialized
variable is probably the most affected warning due to this.

-- 
 Marcel Moolenaar	  USPA: A-39004		 marcel at xcllnt.net