Strawman proposal: making libthr default thread implementation?

[Daniel Eischen]

On Mon, 3 Jul 2006, David Xu wrote:

> On Monday 03 July 2006 20:40, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
>> No, I think those are what libthr lacks in supporting POSIX.
>> I think the problem will be getting our 3 kernel schedulers to
>> support them.
>
> it is mutex code and priority propagating which is already
> supported by turnstile code, in theory, it is not depended
> on scheduler.

Sure it is.  SCHED_FIFO and SCHED_RR are scheduling attributes.
Mutex code and priority propagation have nothing to do with
this.

-- 
DE