libkse -> libpthreads
Narvi
narvi at haldjas.folklore.ee
Mon Apr 21 20:01:56 PDT 2003
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Narvi wrote:
> > If by "now" you mean Solaris 9, then yes, this is so. This is not a
> > fundamental issue, merely how kernel API-s are used. On Solaris 8 you get
> > both the "old" M:N version and the Solaris 9 style 1:1 version in
> > /usr/lib/lwp. There is no way to tell what it will be in Solaris 9+x for
> > some arbitrary positive value of x.
>
> Right. The liblwp in SunOS 4.1.3_U2 (first appearing in SunOS 4.0.2,
> I believe) is a totally different liblwp, as well (just the same name);
> LWP used to be a purely user space abstraction.
>
I don't think there is a liblwp in modern solaris, lwp remains only as a
name for kernel threads. /usr/lib/lwp is just a directory containing
alternative threads libraries on solaris 8 and is a symbolic link to
/usr/lib on solaris 9.
>
> Sun did this same thing in a different order; Linux too:
>
> FreeBSD libc libc_r(N:1) libthr(1:1) libkse(N:M)
> Sun libc liblwp(N:1) liblwp(N:M) liblwp(1:1)
> Linux libc pthreads(N:1) pthreads(1:1) - (no N:M at all)
>
> I've heard it anecdotally claimed that Sun made the change to
> avoid bugs; I've also heard it anecdotally claimed by Sun
> engineers that they made the change because they don't have
> the man power remaining to perform ordinary maintenance on a
> lot of their existing code base. Perhaps they were just
> disgruntled, and the first excuse is the correct one... ;^).
>
the claim in the man page(s)/whitepaper(s) is about perfomance though -
but as always, these would be claims about a particular implementation and
freebsd one might not run into whichever problems caused the speed loss on
solaris.
> -- Terry
>
More information about the freebsd-threads
mailing list