CROSS_TOOLCHAIN=amd64-gcc fails to build after clang 3.6.0 import

[Dimitry Andric]

On 31 Mar 2015, at 22:06, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 31 Mar 2015, at 21:38, Craig Rodrigues <rodrigc at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:20 AM, Dimitry Andric <dim at freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On 31 Mar 2015, at 20:13, Dimitry Andric <dim at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> >> ...
> >>> but then:
> >>>
> >>> + patch
> >>> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
> >>> The text leading up to this was:
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> |Index: contrib/libc++/include/type_traits
> >>> |===================================================================
> >>> |--- contrib/libc++/include/type_traits (revision 280762)
> >>> |+++ contrib/libc++/include/type_traits (working copy)
> >>> --------------------------
> >>> Patching file contrib/libc++/include/type_traits using Plan A...
> >>> Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [y]
> >>> Hunk #1 succeeded at 842.
> >>> Hunk #2 succeeded at 877.
> >>> Hmm...  Ignoring the trailing garbage.
> >>> done
> >>>
> >>> E.g., it undoes the change to type_traits that was merged in the
> >> subversion update.
> >>
> >>
> > OK, I undid the patch.  Now the clang and libc++ parts build, but I'm
> > still getting problems building rescue:
> >
> > https://jenkins.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD_HEAD_external_toolchain_gcc/29/console
> 
> Hm, that is strange.  I have just completed a build with
> amd64-xtoolchain-gcc, and apart from boot2, everything worked...
> 
> What does readelf say when you run it on the cat.lo file which is
> complained about in the log?  And what happens if you delete it, and
> restart the build?
> 
> See:
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-toolchain/2015-March/001545.html

I'm suspecting this might have something to do with crunchide, or least,
the copy of crunchide that is run for this:

--- cat.lo ---
/usr/local/x86_64-freebsd/bin/ld -dc -r -o cat.lo cat_stub.o /builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_external_toolchain_gcc/obj/builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_external_toolchain_gcc/rescue/rescue//builds/FreeBSD_HEAD_external_toolchain_gcc/bin/cat/cat.o
crunchide -k _crunched_cat_stub cat.lo

If I look at my own build logs, it seems to pick the crunchide
executable in /usr/bin, and Makefile.inc1 does *not* build it during the
cross-tools stage if ${TARGET_ARCH} is the same as ${MACHINE_ARCH}:

.if ${TARGET_ARCH} != ${MACHINE_ARCH}
.if ${MK_RESCUE} != "no" || defined(RELEASEDIR)
_crunchide=     usr.sbin/crunch/crunchide
.endif

However, this does not explain why my /usr/bin/crunchide seems to not
screw up cat.lo, while yours does.  As far as I can see, we're both
building this on a stable/10 amd64 box...

Maybe, as a hack, you can force cross-tools to build crunchide, by
patching Makefile.inc1 to ignore the arch check, and see what that
results in?

-Dimitry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/attachments/20150331/e107876d/attachment.sig>