SCCS and batch environment utiltites.
David Schultz
das at FreeBSD.ORG
Tue Feb 3 19:38:36 PST 2004
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004, Wartan Hachaturow wrote:
> SCCS is interesting only as a way to retrieve code from
> old repositories and reinject in some modern scs -- is
> it worth importing, for example, MySC (which is, contrary
> to the GPL-ed CSSC, under public domain) and doing the
> hard (C++) work on bringing it to the conformance?
TeamWare (developed by Larry McVoy before he wrote BitKeeper) is a
modern source code management system that is built on top of SCCS.
(It's a really big hack, but it does some distributed branching
really well, and CVS doesn't.) The point is that there are still
legitimate uses for SCCS. That said, I don't see any reason SCCS
has to be in the base system unless FreeBSD is actively seeking POSIX
certification.
By the way, I believe Juli was working on porting the 4BSD SCCS to
FreeBSD, but I don't know what her eventual purpose for it is.
More information about the freebsd-standards
mailing list