fsck vs zvol

[O'Connor, Daniel]

> On 12 Jun 2019, at 15:47, Patrick M. Hausen <hausen at punkt.de> wrote:
>> Am 12.06.2019 um 03:04 schrieb O'Connor, Daniel <darius at dons.net.au>:
>> I have a small UFS partition that is the sysvol for Samba 4 (otherwise it doesn't work due to ACL issues).
> 
> AFAIK this was fixed by iX Systems for Samba 4.9:
> 
> 	https://jira.ixsystems.com/browse/NAS-100698
> 
> You might want to check if they upstreamed it or if the patch can be
> incorporated in the FreeBSD port if not.

Thanks, I see the samba48 port has a ZFS provisioning patch so I guess it's not necessary anymore.
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/net/samba48/files/0001-Zfs-provision-1.patch?revision=475995&view=markup

I'll find out when I get around to setting up another Samba 4 on ZFS but not sure how long that will be :(

--
Daniel O'Connor
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
 -- Andrew Tanenbaum