stf(4) on 10-stable

[Oliver Pinter]

Added hrs@ to CC.

On 1/13/16, Daniel Bilik <ddb at neosystem.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 17:04:18 +0100
> Daniel Bilik <ddb at neosystem.org> wrote:
>
>> A week ago I upgraded two systems where stf(4) is used. They were running
>> 10-stable from beginning of September, with stf working fine. After
>> upgrade, the address on stf0 stays "tentative" indefinitely.
>
> I've finally got some time to analyze this more thoroughly. And indeed,
> the problem was introduced with both r287734 (changes to in6if_do_dad() in
> sys/netinet6/in6.c) and r290348 (changes to nd6_timer() in
> sys/netinet6/nd6.c), specifically in combination with stf(4) interfaces not
> being
> marked "running". Attached patch fixes that. Should I create PR for this?
>
> --
> 						Dan
>