traffic shaping on RELENG_10 ?

[Karl Denninger]

On 12/16/2015 15:02, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> On 12/16/2015 3:22 PM, Karl Denninger wrote:
>> On 12/16/2015 14:20, Mike Tancsa wrote:
>>> I need to do some simple traffic shaping, but whenever I try and use
>>> altq, I dont seem to have any luck-- I mean zero.
>>>
>>>  I like the management of pf via pf.conf, but miss the simplicity of
>>> dummynet and ipfw.  Has anyone used pf and ipfw together in RELENG10 ?
>>> Any tips / caveats ? Or am I better off re-writing the pf rules into
>>> ipfw and be done with it.
>>>
>>> 	---Mike
>> What are you trying to do?
>>
>> I use rate-shaping in ipfw without problems and have been for quite some
>> time.
> Protect some boxes via pf, and then limit one box from eating up all the
> bandwidth when doing a backups and syncs.
> I would like to keep pf for firewall rules, and I would like to use
> ipfw+DUMMYNET for bandwidth shaping
>
>
> 	---Mike
>
I use this...
   ipfw pipe 1 config bw 3000Kbit/s
   ipfw add 1700 pipe 1 tcp from {wherever} to any

(and so on.... you can add any sort of flow into the pipe, and it will
honor that limit)

Works very well.

-- 
Karl Denninger
karl at denninger.net <mailto:karl at denninger.net>
/The Market Ticker/
/[S/MIME encrypted email preferred]/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2996 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20151216/cb9c4ddc/attachment.bin>