10.1-BETA2 possible kernel memory leak in routing table

[Rumen Telbizov]

As far as I know they have not. I needed to apply them manually after svn
up to the latest 10 stable. It would be great if they become part of
10.1-RELEASE. I have been running with them for 2 weeks now both my
firewalls and everything has been rock solid.

On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Mike Tancsa <mike at sentex.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>         Have these two patches been merged to RELENG_10 ?
>
>         ---Mike
>
> On 10/2/2014 6:25 PM, Rumen Telbizov wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> Alexander, Gleb: good news guys. The problem seems to be resolved! Good
>> job.Here's what I have.
>>
>> 1. I upgraded the backup firewall to 10-STABLE (r272435), applied Gleb's
>> patch of pf_table.c and rebuilt. Just as reported by Gleb, the leak seemed
>> to be reduced but it was still present and leaked a little bit of memory
>> upon every PF reload.
>>
>> 2. In addition to 1) I applied the second patch from Alexander on radix.c
>> and rebuilt the kernel. After the reboot it seems like the amount of
>> memory
>> consumed by the routetbl grows a little bit temporarily after reload and
>> then drops back to the previous, stable amount shortly after.
>>
>> Gleb, Alexander, thank you very much for your help. I appreciate your
>> quick
>> response in providing patches for this problem. I hope those 2 patches get
>> tested by more people and get MFC'ed into 10-STABLE soon.
>>
>
>
> --
> -------------------
> Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400
> Sentex Communications, mike at sentex.net
> Providing Internet services since 1994 www.sentex.net
> Cambridge, Ontario Canada   http://www.tancsa.com/
>



-- 
Rumen Telbizov
Unix Systems Administrator <http://telbizov.com>