Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?

[Chris Rees]

On 21 Feb 2013 02:23, "Greg Miller" <greglmiller at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/20/13, Matthias Andree <matthias.andree at gmx.de> wrote:
> > What is your point, besides getting software from the museum to build
> > stuff from the relative future?
>
> I can't speak for the OP, but I tried it because clang, gcc46, and
> gcc47 wouldn't produce a working executable at all for a long time
> (and continue to fail) on my 9.0 and 9.1 systems. There's been so much
> libreoffice breakage that I don't even bother reporting it or making
> much effort to fix it. I just reboot to Windows for the cases where I
> need a working libreoffice. I don't much care whether gcc 4.2 produces
> a working libreoffice; I just wish something did.

Try the packages Dominic Fandrey generated.

http://wiki.bsdforen.de/anwendungen/libreoffice_aus_inoffiziellen_paketen#freebsd_amd64i386_9183_kamikaze

Chris