[games/ofortune] CFT and pending issues

[A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven]

chrish at UltimateDNS.NET wrote:

>> Should the Makefile define LICENSE? If so, what should it be (BSD I
>> presume) and should LICENSE_FILE be defined as well?
> 
> Given that it /used/ to be part of *BSD. Maybe the (current) BSD license,
> or the MIT 3-clause would be most appropriate.

Sounds like a good idea. Would I be right in saying that just LICENSE=BSD
is sufficient, i.e. I don't need to specify LICENSE_FILE?

AvW

-- 
I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20131206/ebe88289/attachment.sig>