Clang as default compiler

[Chris Rees]

On 12 Sep 2012 07:19, "Christer Solskogen" <christer.solskogen at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Mark Linimon <linimon at lonesome.com>
wrote:
>
> > For most of the failures, we are already aware of them, as a result of
> > our periodic runs.  So, just filing a PR to say "broken on clang"
doesn't
> > really help us all that much.
> >
>
> I disagree. Just a tiny bit ;-)
> If the PR says that USE_GCC=4.2 works as a workaround, it helps.

We don't want thousands of PRs duplicating the information from a simple
list of failures.

Any can be fixed in this way.

Chris