simple patch for portsnap to use wget

[Luca Ferrari]

> Certainly not with a dependency on wget, which is not part of the base
> system. Use fetch instead.
>

Right, so I'm wondering why not using fetch instead of phttpget by default.
However I've rewritten everything so that now it allows for the
configuration of fetch or not. The only change is that in the case of
fetch the server name must be used with a protocol since fetch expects
a full URL and not a server name.

I vote for using fetch by default instead of phttpget.

Regards,
Luca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: portsnap.conf.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20121128/3bf819bd/attachment.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: portsnap.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 3218 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20121128/3bf819bd/attachment-0001.obj>