Why is SU+J undesirable on SSDs?
Jeff Roberson
jroberson at jroberson.net
Sat Nov 3 22:26:55 UTC 2012
On Sat, 3 Nov 2012, Brett Glass wrote:
> Have been following the thread related to SU+J, and am wondering: why is it
> considered to be undesirable on SSDs (assuming that they have good wear
> leveling)? I have been enabling it on systems with SSDs, hoping that between
> the lack of rotating media and the journaling I would have very robust
> systems.
I know of no reason to support this notion. Although SSDs are so fast you
might be happy to wait for the fsck time in exchange for snapshots.
Jeff
>
> --Brett Glass
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list