Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?

Erich erichfreebsdlist at ovitrap.com
Tue Jun 5 06:00:55 UTC 2012


Hi,

On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > 
> > > In message <3506767.Fvm2KmtnYf at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes:
> > > > 
> > > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > It's already there.  If you want the ports as of FreeBSD 4.x EOL
> > > then the tag is "RELEASE_4_EOL".  If you want ports as of FreeBSD
> > > 9.0 then the tag is "RELEASE_9_9_0".
> > > 
> > I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it.
> 
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html

All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched.

I understand this that I can use these tags on the FreeBSD sources but not on the ports.

I never tried this on the ports.

Erich


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list