Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD?
Erich
erichfreebsdlist at ovitrap.com
Tue Jun 5 06:00:55 UTC 2012
Hi,
On 05 June 2012 15:33:16 Mark Andrews wrote:
>
> In message <2490439.EC638TI0j3 at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 05 June 2012 12:48:20 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > >
> > > In message <3506767.Fvm2KmtnYf at x220.ovitrap.com>, Erich writes:
> > > >
> > > > On 05 June 2012 11:24:25 Mark Andrews wrote:
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > It's already there. If you want the ports as of FreeBSD 4.x EOL
> > > then the tag is "RELEASE_4_EOL". If you want ports as of FreeBSD
> > > 9.0 then the tag is "RELEASE_9_9_0".
> > >
> > I did not know this. Do you have a link for this? I never read about it.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html
All of these, with the exception of HEAD (which is always a valid tag), only apply to the src/ tree. The ports/, doc/, and www/ trees are not branched.
I understand this that I can use these tags on the FreeBSD sources but not on the ports.
I never tried this on the ports.
Erich
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list