boot0cfg problems

Bruce Cran bruce at cran.org.uk
Fri Oct 1 15:07:10 UTC 2010


On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 04:34:34 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <freebsd at jdc.parodius.com> wrote:

> Anyway, if the MBR did get updated without kern.geom.debugflags having
> bit 4 set, then wouldn't this indicate there's a bug in GEOM's "sector
> 0" protection?

Or that it knows that updating the active byte is harmless.

-- 
Bruce Cran


More information about the freebsd-stable mailing list