Call for testers: FPU changes

[Mike Tancsa]

On 11/16/2010 5:19 PM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> Would your conclusion be that the patch seems to increase the throughput
> of the aesni(4) ?
> 
> I think that on small-sized blocks, when using aesni(4), the dominating
> factor is the copying/copyout of the data to/from the kernel address
> space. Still would be interesting to compare the full output
> of "openssl speed" on aesni(4) with and without the patch I posted.

Hi,
	There does seem to be some improvement on large blocks.  But there are
some freakishly fast times. On other sizes, there is no difference in
speed it would seem

I did 20 runs. Updated stats at http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html

	---Mike