ZFS: separate pools
Eric Damien
jafa82 at gmail.com
Sat May 8 22:23:38 UTC 2010
On Monday 03 May 2010 22:34:57 Emil Mikulic wrote:
> On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 10:16:57PM -0400, Charles Sprickman wrote:
> > Just some random data. I know when I was reading about ZFS I did
> > come across some vague notion that zfs wanted the entire drive to
> > better deal with queueing, not sure if that was official Sun docs or
> > some random blog though...
>
> ZFS on Solaris only enables write caching when it's given an entire disk.
> pjd@ has stated that this does not affect FreeBSD, only Solaris.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
>
So, correct me if I am wrong:
1- I need to let go the slice/partitions concepts and now think in matter of
pool/filesystems ?
2- And assuming "1-" is right, I have to dedicate an entire disk to a zpool ?
3- If "2-" is also true, my preoccupation now is, when I shall need to
reinstall the OS, what are the steps to go through in order to preserve my
data - especially the "/home" filesystem -, across the two installations ?
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list