8.x grudges
Paul Mather
paul at gromit.dlib.vt.edu
Thu Jul 8 12:37:33 UTC 2010
On Jul 7, 2010, at 5:39 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Mikhail T. <mi+thun at aldan.algebra.com> wrote:
>> 07.07.2010 14:59, Jeremy Chadwick ???????(??):
>>>>
>>>> FREEBSD_COMPAT7 kernel option is, apparently, a requirement (and
>>>> thus not an "option") -- the kernel-config files, that worked with
>>>> 7.x, break without this option in them (in addition to all the
>>>> nuisance, that's documented in UPDATING -- which, somehow, makes
>>>> the breakage acceptable). config(8) would not warn about this, but
>>>> kernel build fails.
>>>>
>>>
>>> We don't use this option (meaning it's removed from our kernels). It's
>>> definitely not required. All it does is ensure your kernel can
>>> comprehend executables/binaries built on 7.x.
>>>
>>
>> Attached is the kernel config-file (i386), that worked fine under 7.x. The
>> kernel-compile will break (some *freebsd7* structs undefined), without the
>> COMPAT_FREEBSD7 option. Try it for yourself...
>
> options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory
> options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues
> options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores
>
> Those require COMPAT_FREEBSD7.
I have an FreeBSD/amd64 8.1-PRERELEASE system with all COMPAT_FREEBSDx options except COMPAT_FREEBSD32 commented out in my kernel config file and it builds fine. So, unless I am misunderstanding you, I don't think "options SYSV{SHM,MSG,SEM}" requires COMPAT_FREEBSD7.
Cheers,
Paul.
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list