immense delayed write to file system (ZFS and UFS2),
performance issues
Chuck Swiger
cswiger at mac.com
Tue Jan 26 19:23:58 UTC 2010
Hi--
On Jan 26, 2010, at 10:45 AM, Dan Naumov wrote:
> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age
> Always - 136
> 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 199 199 000 Old_age
> Always - 5908
>
> The disks are of exact same model and look to be same firmware. Should
> I be worried that the newer disk has, in 136 hours reached a higher
> Load Cycle count twice as big as on the disk thats 5253 hours old?
Yes. Drive actuators are (or used to be) typically rated for at least 50,000 load-cycle counts; at ~1000 events per day, there's about a 50% chance of such a drive dying before two years are up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_disk_drive#Landing_zones_and_load.2Funload_technology
Some models of drives intended for laptops (typically smaller 2.5" form factor w/ single platter) can tolerate many more load-cycles, and newer drives also claim to handle more.
Regards,
--
-Chuck
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list