reecommendations for an 'appliance" platform ?
TJ Varghese
tj at tjvarghese.com
Sun Jun 14 11:38:16 UTC 2009
Aragon Gouveia wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Pete French wrote:
>>> I'm not 100% sure, but fairly sure that you'll have a hard time
>>> finding something that combines the low-power standalone type spec with
>>> a 64-bit capable processor. Once you get the higher-end processor,
>>
>> That was my experiense when shopping around yes - annoying as I
>> don't need anything particularly low power (it ain't going to
>> be my leccy bill :-).
>
> The Atom 230 and 330 are supposed to be 64-bit capable:
>
> http://ark.intel.com/Compare.aspx?ids=36331,35635,35641,
>
> but I have not personally tested either with an AMD64 FreeBSD install.
I've tried the Atom330 (D945GCLF2). It works fine with amd64...however
it's rather wasted for 64bit considering it maxes out at 2gb. But I
suppose if you wanted to standardize on amd64 installs, this is good.
Gigabit - ok, re0. You'll need 7.2 at least.
USB - ok
SATA - 2 ports tested only with gmirror, ok.
Xorg- not tested
audio - not tested
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3237 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20090614/725e6d1d/smime.bin
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list