challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Garance A Drosehn]

At 3:29 PM -0700 6/7/08, Jo Rhett wrote:
>On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Garance A Drosehn wrote:
>>The fact that we reject your request that we provide further support
>>for 6.2 does not mean we did not understand the question.  It is you
>>who are not understanding the reply.
>
>At the very least, I phrased my question badly.  Because I asked 
>"why" and I heard "no".  And "no" is not an answer to "why".  I 
>still haven't heard the why.

Apparently the email with this answer from Doug Barton did not
reach you:

     Lack of time on the part of the people that do the support.
     (As has been explained lots of times already.) I realize
     that you'd rather have an answer that gives you something
     to argue about, but there isn't one.

Nothing has changed since his email.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn     =               drosehn at rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer               or   gad at FreeBSD.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute;             Troy, NY;  USA