challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Jo Rhett]

On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote:
> You are in fact saying 6.3-RELEASE should not have been released at  
> the
> time it was. It should have been posponed 'till some open bugs were
> solved. I agree with you that a RELEASE is supposed to be more  
> mature /
> stable then a development version. And you state it is -not-


That's direct criticism that I am not willing to make of the  
contributors.  I'm sure everyone did the best they could, and with  
what they knew at the time.

I'm saying that now, in retrospect, it doesn't appear to be a stable  
release.  Forcing everyone to upgrade to a unstable release doesn't  
seem likely to help improve the situation.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness