challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Jo Rhett]

On Jun 5, 2008, at 10:27 AM, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's quite possible what was proposed is an awful idea and if it is
>> so be it. But it would appear as though it wasn't even considered.
>
> On the contrary. This, and lots of other ideas have been given very  
> careful consideration and have been rejected due to lack of  
> resources. There, feel better?
>
> Seriously folks, it's not as if we don't _want_ to be able to  
> provide better, longer, faster, $whatever support. We're just trying  
> to be realistic about what we can reasonably do with what we have  
> available.


Doug, would you possibly (without attacking me?) give some insight  
into the issues here?  This is what I was asking: what prevents  
supporting 6.2 ?  Where could I best apply some of my time to improve  
the situation?

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness