challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Jo Rhett]

On Jun 5, 2008, at 9:34 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
> As for re-defining extended support to mean 4 or 5 years instead of  
> just
> two it's not clear us doing that (except for anomolies like 4.11) is
> really in your best interests.  :-)

2 years would be perfectly fine in my mind.  I'd love to see 2 years  
of support for 6.2-RELEASE.

6.2 was (and *is* AFAIK) the most stable release of FreeBSD since 4.11  
and it came out the door with less than 12 months of support intended.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source  
and other randomness