challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3

[Michael Gratton]

On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 12:08 -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2008, at 4:43 PM, Clifton Royston wrote:
> 
> >  Speaking just for myself, I'd love to get a general response from
> > people who have run servers on both as to whether 6.3 is on average
> > more stable than 6.2.  I really haven't gotten any clear impression as
> 
> I'll throw in my "+1" for running 6.3.  I have it on many boxes, some  
> of which run gmirror and some of which have bge devices (some with  
> both).  Never any problems.  They operate things varying from Postgres  
> servers to DNS servers to mail servers (postfix) under pretty  
> consistent load pushing lots and lots of data both network and to disk.

AOL! 6.3 with gmirror is rock solid here for web, mail, dns and db. No
bge here, but still, I haven't seen 6.3 glitch once.

/Mike

-- 
Michael Gratton <michael at quuxo.com>     
Quuxo Software <http://web.quuxo.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20080606/c9c92e6c/attachment.pgp