Reverting to 6.2-RELEASE
Vivek Khera
vivek at khera.org
Mon Mar 19 16:12:36 UTC 2007
On Mar 19, 2007, at 9:24 AM, LI Xin wrote:
> I always use options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE for my kernel :-) Maybe we
> should add it to DEFAULTS some day...
ew yucky....
What I do is keep my kernel configs in subversion. I have a "common"
component which applies to all systems under my control, and an
architecture specific component that applies separately to i386 vs.
amd64 systems. In each, I take advantage of the fact that the config
file can have 'makeoptions' which are basically dumped right into the
generated Makefile.
So in my common file, KCICOMMON, I have this at the top:
makeoptions KCICOMMONREV="$Revision: 366 $"
makeoptions KCICOMMON="${KCICOMMONREV:C/[^0-9]//g}"
and in the i386 specific file, KCI32, I have this:
ident "KCI32@${KCI}+${KCICOMMON}"
makeoptions KCIREV="$Revision: 358 $"
makeoptions KCI="${KCIREV:C/[^0-9]//g}"
Since some of my systems are SMP enabled, I have a minor variant
called "KCI32SMP" also, which is entirely this:
include KCI32
ident "KCI32SMP@${KCI}+${KCICOMMON}"
options SMP
now, my kernel identifies itself with uname:
% uname -i
KCI32SMP at 358+366
So I know this is a 32-bit system running SMP with the version 358
i386 config and the version 366 common config.
and a trivial lookup in subversion tells me exactly what's in it.
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list