powerd freeze with amd 5000 X2 but not with lower cpus

[Peter Jeremy]

On 2007-Jul-28 19:03:54 -0300, JoaoBR <joao at matik.com.br> wrote:
>so using ULE in 7 is ok ? ? ?

Yes.

>ULE in 6.x is absolutely ok and it runs depending on situation faster than 
>4BSD with correct kernel and sysctl settings for it and it is perfectly 
>stable,

This is simply wrong.  ULE in 6.x is known to have problems and is
unsupported.  If the problems do not affect your particular workload
then fine.  If you have _any_ problems whilst running with ULE in 6.x,
your problems will not be invstigated unless you can reproduce the
problem with the 4BSD scheduler.

As Kris stated, reporting problems in 6.x when you are running ULE is
just wasting developer resources.

Please stop implying that people should be using ULE in 6.x unless you
are willing to personally provide support for them.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20070728/9bb2a1b4/attachment.pgp