quota deadlock on 6.1-RC1

[Janet Sullivan]

Mike Jakubik wrote:
> arrive at the sacrifice of stability. I think FreeBSD should only be 
> released when known major bugs are worked out. A known broken release to 
> me and most new users is useless, lets not release simply for the sake 
> of numbering.

For me, and many other quiet users, FreeBSD *IS* stable.  I've been 
running 6.1 since the BETAs with no issues.  No, I don't use quotas.  I 
doubt the majority of FreeBSD users do.

> I wish i was a good Unix C programmer myself, so i could contribute in a 
> more direct way (always hated those damn pointers), 

You could always hire or help sponsor a developer to fix your pet issues.