fsck_ufs locked in snaplk

[Kris Kennaway]

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 05:02:00PM -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Dmitry Morozovsky wrote:
> >On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >
> >KK> OK, I wish you and others had responded to my call for testing a month
> >KK> or more ago :) All (both) of the responses indicated that the quota
> >KK> problems had been fixed following changes made then.  At this point it
> >KK> may be too late for 6.x, but we'll see.
> >
> >Well, I'm quite sure this change is not too disruptive, and it *does* fix 
> >quota panics, so I hope RE will aprove this (CC:'d)
> >  
> 
> It would be really embarrassing if quota was broken across two major 
> releases. This has held me back from updating many 5.x machines which 
> require quota. I hope all will be well for 6.1.

This is true, but I hope you recognise that a good part of the
responsibility for this falls on the users when asked to test proposed
fixes.  If the developers are not aware of remaining problems they
can't reasonably be expected to fix them :-)

Kris
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20060425/400cf57e/attachment.pgp