Gratuitous ARP

[Colin Farley]

   Hi Matt,



   Thanks for your reply.     you think that lowering the   seen that Cisco does not recommen   after reading your reply and seeing as the   hosts on this subnet I would think that thi   confirm. Thanks again.



   
   Colin

   -----owner-freebsd-stable at freebsd
     To: freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
     From: Matt Douhan <matt at fru     Sent by: owner-freebsd-stable at freebsd.org
     Date: 09/19     cc: Colin Farley <Colin.Farley at ecarecenters.com>
          On Monday 19 September 2005 19:31, Colin      >    1.&nbs=p; Set the arp cache timeou     very low so
     >    that outages a=re      it will
     >    p     know little>    about cisco devices so=I really cant figure this
     one      >    think that this is a bad th=ing? &n     cisco device not to
     >    cache arp entri     subnet
     >         so bad after
          Depending on your Cisco router model you will     whatsoever
     lowering the timeout to really low, in      seconds.
     even an old 25xx device would be to han     >
     >    2.  Ru     device, this
     >       go     >    solution but security is a concern.
     This wou     security
     concern     --
     Matt Douhan
     www.fruitsalad.org
     (remem     Titanic)
     ___     ______________________     5F__     freebsd-stable     [1]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li     To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stab     le-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
     
   
References

   1. 3D"http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li