Fw: GENERIC and DEFAULTS

[Ruslan Ermilov]

On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 12:27:21PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2005, dick hoogendijk wrote:
> 
> >Sure, but I think it's the *syntax* that matters here? options -> 
> >nooptions / i486_cpu -> no??? It's OK to leave GENERIC alone, but HOW 
> >are things switched off?
> 
> It appears to be an ommission in the file format.  I've e-mailed Ruslan, 
> who implemented nodevice and nooption, to suggest that he also add nocpu. 
> I wonder if there are other missed syntactic bits of note.
> 
I've committed a code that implements the "nocpu" directive, FWIW.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov
ru at FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD committer
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20051103/c594cfb4/attachment.bin