Xorg 6.8.1

[Godwin Stewart]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:25:24 +1030, "Daniel O'Connor"
<doconnor at gsoft.com.au> wrote:

> You don't need to update a port just because it depends on Xorg. The X
> API is quite stable so you can update just Xorg without expecting any
> problems. (I did XFree86 -> Xorg with zero problems for example)

No, the problem's the other way round. Every time I want to portupgrade
something else, portupgrade also wants to upgrade Xorg. I don't want the
latest Xorg after the horror stories I heard.

That's why I'm building firefox-1.0.1 independently of the ports system, so
that I don't have to go through the pain of upgrading Xorg (on which
firefox depends, naturally) as well.

Now, if I could be certain that Xorg has settled down, I wouldn't mind
upgrading from 6.7.0 to 6.8.1 and have done with it.

- -- 
G. Stewart - gstewart at bonivet.net

The average nutritional value of promises is roughly zero.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFCIGX1K5oiGLo9AcYRAnxVAKCMuYMlZxaqjrqCUI1eKxJC/9QN5gCgqpKD
sOKB6hFwBJ1BdY42Zi3ItuA=
=6QjU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----