ULE status

[Simon Barner]

Frode Nordahl wrote:
> I was surprised by the actual difference in system performance and 
> usability between 4BSD and ULE under such loads!
> 
> If you haven't tried it on your heavy trafic server yet, go and do it 
> right now! :-)

Just a short "me too". In my case it isn't a heavy traffic server but a
(slow) UP desktop system which "feels" substantially smoother with ULE.

Simon
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/attachments/20050210/17d798fb/attachment.bin