ULE status
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Wed Feb 9 02:29:54 PST 2005
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:13:22 +0200 (EET)
"Viktor Ivanov" <v0rbiz at icon.bg> wrote:
> On Tue, Ôåâðóàðè 8, 2005 15:58, Ion-Mihai Tetcu êàçà:
> >> I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error
> >> def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble
> >> with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced.
> >>
> >> On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general
> >> system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance.
> >
> > By any chance does it help with copying from ata disks on different
> > controllers ? For me on large files this brings up "swap_pager:
> > indefinite wait buffer" with 4BSD.
>
> Sorry, can't test this. I know my WS can't compare to a normal server
> and I don't have a production server running on SCHED_ULE (excuse the
> pun). As I said though, I tried once SCHED_ULE on a P4 with 1 CPU
> and HTT enabled and it paniced way too fast. That was when SCHED_ULE
> was #error-ed...
NP, I'll give ULE and sos's new ATA a try this weekend and see.
> As for rtprio, I do set it after I run mplayer, because I run it from
> normal user and rtprio is limited to root.
Michael says is resolved :)
Thanks,
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
More information about the freebsd-stable
mailing list