ULE status

[Viktor Ivanov]

On Tue, Февруари 8, 2005 14:33, Michael Nottebrock каза:
> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote:
>> I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch.
>> Beneath is one of them:
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html
>>
>> Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not?
>
> You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it
> works
> is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here
> since yesterday only).

Hi there

I've been using only SCHED_ULE on my UP WS, even when there was #error
def. It never broke, not even once :) Though I think there's trouble
with SMP and/or HTT. I tried it once on a P4 and it paniced.

On the other hand, using SCHED_ULE improves sound quality and general
system 'response' concerning GUI... don't know 'bout performance.

Regards