ULE status

[Mipam]

On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Michael Nottebrock wrote:

> On Tuesday, 8. February 2005 13:07, Mipam wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I saw several changes to sched_ule.c in the 5 stable branch.
> > Beneath is one of them:
> >
> > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2005-February/039863.html
> >
> > Is the ULE scheduler still far from stable in RELENG_5 or not?
> 
> You can now compile a kernel with options SCHED_ULE again. How well it works 
> is for yourself to determine :-) (I've been using it on my UP machine here 
> since yesterday only).

Okay, so then the ULE sched is fairly stable then?
But it's still not the default scheduler? Is it safe to use right now 
under RELENG_5 or not? Oh yes, i have smp machines, two physical cpu's and 
one machine with a hyperthreading cpu and i do have preemption enabled in 
the kernel config. Would that be still safe to try?
 Bye,

Mipam.