standard-supfile = stable-supfile with 5.3 ?

[Björn König]

Rob wrote:

> If so, then why do we have a standard-supfile and a stable-supfile
> doing the same thing? If both bring you -STABLE, one of the two seems
> to be redundant to me and having two sup files doing the same only
> causes confusion.

Maybe you're right. There is a kind of redundancy now, but these two files brought not always the same. It would be more confusing if you have two different files and someday one them is missing, because someone deleted it.

Björn