gem0 frame error
Marius Strobl
marius at alchemy.franken.de
Tue Jun 24 20:43:07 UTC 2008
On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 08:56:53AM +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 11:14:09AM -0500, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > Kage wrote:
> > >
> > >Marius Strobl wrote:
> > >
> > >>With what version of FreeBSD is this?
> > >>
> > >>Marius
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>freebsd-sparc64 at freebsd.org mailing list
> > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64
> > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn
> > >about
> > >systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this
> > >system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT
> > >half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I
> > >checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I
> > >have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT.
> > >Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good
> > >switch fixed the problem completely.
> > >
> > >At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help!
> > >
> > >(It is 7.0-release, by the way)
> > >
> > Regardless... shouldn't the driver properly deal with being plugged into
> > a 10BT Half-Duplex environment?
>
> Yes, it should. At least we know there is an issue on 10Mbps link
> with gem(4). Marius may have better idea as he touched gem(4)
> recently.
>
Chances are that half-duplex support was broken before if_gem.c 1.44/
172334. That's why I asked for the FreeBSD version this is happening
with.
Marius
More information about the freebsd-sparc64
mailing list