kgdb still broken?

[David O'Brien]

On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:31:02PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Aug 20, 2005, at 12:09 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>What exactly is unreliable about backtraces in kgdb?
> >
> >Wih gdb53 I see the following:
...
> >While the kgdb output is useless:
...
> I see. As I said, kgdb cannot yet unwind across trapframes. Other
...
> platforms and merged into gdb. I don't see a point in fixing
> backtraces at the cost of the partial threading support we have
> now. In other words: it requires too much work for me to embark
> on it right now.

So you removed our working GDB 5.3-based kgdb and replaced it with
something mostly useless.  That's progress.

-- 
-- David  (obrien at FreeBSD.org)