panic: trap: memory address not aligned in ata_prtdev() with Nov 18 GENERIC

[Garance A Drosihn]

At 8:29 PM -0500 11/30/03, Robert Watson wrote:
>This was with a November 18th GENERIC kernel on a blade100.
>dmesg also below.  This appears to be highly reproduceable,
>and might be a property of the bgfsck running on the system.
>
>I'll try sliding forward to a more recent kernel, if I can
>keep the box up.

If you put:   background_fsck="NO"
in /etc/rc.conf, does that change the panic probability?

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad at gilead.netel.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad at freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih at rpi.edu